Recent Comments

9/11 9-11 Series abortion advertising Afghanistan Africa AIDS air travel art atheism Austrian economics Avatar Barack Obama BCFNM Bill Clinton biology blogging books bureaucracy campaign finance capitalism children China Christianity Congress conservatism Continental corporatism crime culture culture war debt deflation democracy Democratic Party development diplomacy domestic policy Driving Test Series drug policy economics education elections energy policy environmental policy ESL Series Ezra Klein Facebook Featured Find federalism food foreign policy Fox News Freddie deBoer Front Porch Republic gay rights Glenn Beck Goldman Sachs government spending H1N1 health care hip hop history humor immigration Inception India inflation Information Generation Internet Iran Iraq Israel Japan Japanese culture Keynesianism Kyoto Series language liberalism libertarianism marriage Marxism math media medicine microfinance military policy Mitt Romney Modern Visionaries Series morality movies music nanny state NASA neo-tradition neuroscience Nobel Prize nuclear weapons Osama bin Laden Pakistan Paul Krugman pharmacology philosophy photography politics porn prison policy privatization Rand Paul recession religion Republican Party reviews Ron Paul Rube Goldberg Machines Russia Sam Harris Sarah Palin satire savings science security Shinto socialism Spencer Ackerman sports stimulus Table of the Worthy taxes Tea Party technology terrorism The Cove the mundane The U.K. To Autumn Series Tohoku Earthquake Series torture trade policy tradition travel travel writing TSA turds U.S. Dollar unemployment
Explore

 

 

Inductive Twitter
Inductive Facebook
Sources
« Lessons from Chicago's Loss: Reevaluating America's Tourism Policy | Main | Obama's New Marijuana Policy: One Tiny Step for Mankind »
Wednesday
Oct212009

Could a Major Iran Nuclear Deal Happen?

I love that the snap consensus on nearly any foreign policy news of the day turns out to be lacking the nuanced information that the real players have.  When Obama announced that he was pulling Bush's plan for an Eastern European missile shield, the snap reaction was that it was done to placate Russia and gain leverage for sanctions on Iran and that it was a huge concession with no guarantee of results.  The reality turned out to be that not only was Obama barely changing the status quo on the missile shield - he still plans to have missile interceptors in Poland - but that rather than tougher new sanctions, the plan was a deal with important concessions on both sides and, despite the "setback" that Russia wouldn't agree to new sanctions - Russia plays a huge role in the deal.  It is creative diplomacy in other words, rather than a strict adherence to a failed plan.

While it is still too early to know how things will turn out (see above) - the deal hasn't been agreed to after all - the major concessions seem to be that the 5+1 group (U.S., U.K., France, Russia, China and Germany) - implicitly (but not explicitly) endorses Iran's right to enrich uranium in violation of their obligations under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in exchange for a deal where Iran exports 75-80% of its enriched uranium to Russia and France to be further enriched for use in a medical reactor, which would make it unusable for bomb making.  As Spencer Ackerman points out: "This would represent the first time that anyone has succeeded in putting time back on the Iranian nuclear clock. It would be a major diplomatic victory for Obama, and for the Forces Of Good in general."

Even better, it would give both sides an opportunity to demonstrate good faith for tougher issues ahead.  It seems clear that despite the hand wringing about how the Iranian election would be bad for the process by making it difficult for the international community to negotiate with a government with questionable legitimacy, Obama's careful approach has paid dividends.  If Juan Cole is right, and Iran's real goal is peaceful nuclear power with nuclear latency - the so called "Japanese option" - then this would be step one towards a nuclear Iran the world can live with.  My hope that this deal will allow time for an Israel-Palestine peace summit in the interim before Iran could possibly rebuild its nuclear stockpile to a level where it could make a bomb.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>