Recent Comments

9/11 9-11 Series abortion advertising Afghanistan Africa AIDS air travel art atheism Austrian economics Avatar Barack Obama BCFNM Bill Clinton biology blogging books bureaucracy campaign finance capitalism children China Christianity Congress conservatism Continental corporatism crime culture culture war debt deflation democracy Democratic Party development diplomacy domestic policy Driving Test Series drug policy economics education elections energy policy environmental policy ESL Series Ezra Klein Facebook Featured Find federalism food foreign policy Fox News Freddie deBoer Front Porch Republic gay rights Glenn Beck Goldman Sachs government spending H1N1 health care hip hop history humor immigration Inception India inflation Information Generation Internet Iran Iraq Israel Japan Japanese culture Keynesianism Kyoto Series language liberalism libertarianism marriage Marxism math media medicine microfinance military policy Mitt Romney Modern Visionaries Series morality movies music nanny state NASA neo-tradition neuroscience Nobel Prize nuclear weapons Osama bin Laden Pakistan Paul Krugman pharmacology philosophy photography politics porn prison policy privatization Rand Paul recession religion Republican Party reviews Ron Paul Rube Goldberg Machines Russia Sam Harris Sarah Palin satire savings science security Shinto socialism Spencer Ackerman sports stimulus Table of the Worthy taxes Tea Party technology terrorism The Cove the mundane The U.K. To Autumn Series Tohoku Earthquake Series torture trade policy tradition travel travel writing TSA turds U.S. Dollar unemployment
Explore

 

 

Inductive Twitter
Inductive Facebook
Sources
« Black Gold and the Law of Large Numbers | Main | Somewhere Kurzweil is Smiling »
Wednesday
Sep302009

How to Win at Art

I've been using his "Android Brain-Animal Brain" idea a lot recently, so I thought I'd link to this genius series of articles on how to "score" art by Ken Arneson.  He postulates that language is the way our android brains, the conscious, reflective part of our brain, communicates, but that our animal brain, that is our evolved animal instincts, uses art to communicate.  Our animal brain uses pattern recognition in art to form associative memories that are the currency of creativity.  Good art forms lots of memories, bad art forms none.  The best art avoids habituation (the recognition of familiarity that allows us to ignore reoccurring patterns as unimportant so we aren't distracted from keeping a watchful eye out for new stuff that might be important to our survival) and cliche even upon repeat viewings.

Beyond art, that struggle between our animal and android brains seems pretty right on in my everyday life.  Life is the attempt to train our animal brain to shape its powerful tactics into the service of our long term android strategies.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (1)

As a stoic, I more or less agree. However, I'm generally a big fan of spontaneous order (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spontaneous_order) as a way of explaining unexplainable things, and I generally agree with Tolstoy and others in thinking that standards in art, as well as the monetary system, and evolution, evolved in the same way your post describes. Well done.

October 21, 2009 | Registered CommenterChristopher Carr

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>